IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.Sarath
Vanga Kanaka Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. questioning the memo regarding cancellation deeds. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court observations on the relationship and execution of deeds. (Para 2 , 5 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. arguments on the legality of cancellation and jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 6 , 12) |
| 4. ratio regarding appeal rights under the act. (Para 7 , 14) |
| 5. confirmed relationships and deed executions without dispute. (Para 9 , 13) |
| 6. authority errors and procedural compliance emphasized by court. (Para 11) |
| 7. final ruling to allow the writ petition. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
K.Sarath, J.
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the Memo in Rc.No.108 of 2024 dated 08.07.2024 issued by the respondent No.5 in refraining to cancel the cancellation documents bearing Nos.5511/2024, 5512/2024, 5513/2024 dated 18.06.2024 in pursuance of the order passed by the respondent No.3 in Appeal No.B/120/2024 dated 15.06.2024 as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard Sri J. Ashwin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Smt N.V.R. Rajya Laxmi, learned counsel for the respondent No.6.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent
H. Deepika vs. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Appellate Tribunal
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.