Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
The State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Rajulapati Yashoda Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the criminal petition and original complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court observations on jurisdictional authority. (Para 4 , 9 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. ruling on the legality of the remand rejection. (Para 16) |
| 5. conclusion of the criminal petition. (Para 17) |
ORDER :
K. SUJANA, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the order dated 23.12.2024 passed in Crl.R.P.No.57 of 2024 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Malkajgiri.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Criminal Revision Petition was filed by the Inspector of Police, EOW Police Station, Cyberabad commissionerate under Section 438 of the BNSS , aggrieved by the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally. The revision arose out of Crime No.43 of 2024, which was re-registered based on a report lodged by Smt. P. Rajeshwari, Director of Girija Builders Pvt. Ltd., against the accused, her sister’s son. She alleged that the accused mi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
