Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
J RAMABHADRA RAJU RAM RAJU – Appellant
Versus
MOTHKALA LAXMAMMA SADABOINA LAXMAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. joint ownership of ancestral property (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims about property ownership and relationships (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defendant no.2's claim as bona fide purchaser (Para 9) |
| 4. determining ancestral versus self-acquired property (Para 16 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. criteria for bona fide purchaser status (Para 23 , 24) |
| 6. conclusion on appeal dismissal (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
RENUKA YARA, J.
Heard Sri Manda Adam, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri S.Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri D. Kaval Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 35. Perused the entire record.
2. This is an appeal preferred by appellant/defendant No.2 aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2018 passed by the Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy (‘trial Court’), in O.S.No.53 of 2013, wherein the suit filed for partition was preliminarily decreed by partitioning the suit schedule property that is item No.2 of suit schedule A property and schedule B properties into three equal shares and allotting the same to plaintiff/respondent No.1, defendant Nos.1 and 3/respondent Nos.2 and 3 and by partitioning the item No.1 of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
