Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
V.Shyam – Appellant
Versus
B.Raj Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's claims and defendant's counterclaims (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court issues and proceedings (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appellant's arguments (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. respondent's arguments (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court's analysis and conclusions (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. final order (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J.
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 08.06.2018 passed in O.S.No.87 of 2014 by the learned XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad (for short “the trial Court”).
2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant before the trial Court. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit before the trial Court for the sake of convenience and clarity.
3. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendant is the owner of suit schedule property and that he agreed to sell the same for a total consideration of Rs.20,51,000/- out of which Rs.20,00,000/- was paid to the defendant in cash on the date of agreement of sale i.e. 06.06.2011 and the defendant has also handed over the original title deed of the suit sched
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
