Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vangapalli Shankaramma , Shankaravva – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R.Madhusudhan Rao, J.
1. This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) by the Insurance Company arising out of an order passed by The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – cum –Principal District Judge, Mancherial (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in MVOP.No.25 of 2019 dated 30.06.2022.
2.1 Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – petitioner Nos.1 to 4 have filed claim petition under Section 166(1)(c) of the MV Act read with Rule 455 of A.P.Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 claiming compensation of Rs.9,35,000/- against respondent Nos.5 and 6 - owner and driver of the crime vehicle and appellant herein - respondent No.3 jointly and severally together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the petition till the date of payment for the accident of Vangapalli Laxman @ Lachaiah occurred on 25.07.2018 at 2.30 p.m.
2.2 Respondent No.1 - petitioner No.1 is the wife, respondent Nos.2 to 4 – petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are the children of Late Vangapalli Laxman @ Lachaiah.
3. On 25.07.2018 at about 2.30 p.m. Vangapalli Laxman @ Lachaiah was going in his auto bearing No.AP-15-A-7796 along with his cousin brother by name Chandragiri Thirup
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
