Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Mr. P.V. Krishnamachary – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Mahesh Raje – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges lok adalat award's validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the award's legal standing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court identifies discrepancies in documentation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. statutory requirements for lok adalat awards. (Para 11 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on award's validity and petitioner's rights. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. The petitioner prays for setting aside of Lok Adalat Award dated 09.03.2019 in C.C.No.536 of 2019 passed by I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Warangal and for a consequential direction on the respondent No.3 (the Station House Officer, Inthezargunj Police Station, Warangal), to conduct the trial against the respondent No.4 in connection with C.C.No.536 of 2019.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition are as follows. These facts are reflected from the charge-sheet dated 22.02.2019 in FIR No.217 of 2017.
(a) On 29.06.2018 at 12.30 hours, the petitioner filed a complaint in the Police Station, Inthezargunj, Warangal District stating that the petitioner is the authorized person of M/s.Sri Sai Corporation Chillies Merchants and Exp
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
