Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
P. Vijaya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion approval request and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's counterarguments against retrospective promotions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal analysis on promotion timelines and validity. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. writ petition dismissal ordered. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to accord promotion to petitioners to the post of School Assistant from SGT from the date of promotions granted by the 5th respondent to petitioners i.e. 1999 to 2002 respectively instead of 01.07.2004 with all consequential benefits like seniority, increments and payment of arrears, etcetera.
2. The case of petitioners is that they are all working as School Assistants (Maths and Science Subjects) in the 5th respondent School on promotion from their initial post of Secondary Grade Teachers with requisite qualifications between 1999-2002 as per their seniority and subject requirement in a clear, sanctioned, aided vacancies arisen out of retirement. As it is an aided school, the 5th respondent management submitted proposals to the 4th respondent through Deputy Educational Officer for approval. Later the 4th respondent forwarded t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
