IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Sujana
Bombay Colour Agency – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitions and basis for claims (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the inclusion of new accused (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. legal basis for inclusion of additional accused (Para 11) |
| 4. limitations of applying section 319 cr.p.c. in n.i. act cases (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's reasoning for dismissing the petitions (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. final decision on petitions (Para 16) |
ORDER :
K. Sujana, J.
Since the issue involved in all these criminal petitions are one and the same, they are being heard together and being disposed of by way of this common order.
2. These Criminal Petitions are filed seeking to set aside the order dated 19.11.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.30, 33, 28 and 32 of 2023 in C.C.Nos.204885, 204894, 205248 and 204895 of 2018, respectively, by the learned XVI Additional Judge-cum-XX Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.
3. The brief facts of the cases are that the petitioner/complainant in all the cases had filed petitions, respectively, under Section 319 Cr.P.C. seeking to include Mr. Arun Kumar Agarwal, Executive Director of the accused company, as accused No.3 in the original complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable I
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.