Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN
Dharavath Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the auction process. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' arguments regarding the forfeiture of the advance. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis of the petitioner's payment issues. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal principles regarding advance and forfeiture. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's final order regarding the refund. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER :
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.4.
FACTS
2. The Government has issued G.O.Rt.No.20, dated 10.03.2020 for disposal of all assets of respondent No.2 by conducting an open auction on an “as is where is” basis, and constitution of a High Power Committee of Secretaries to work out the modalities for disposal.
2.1. Pursuant to the said G.O., respondent No.4 vide letter dated 12.01.2022 sought permission from the Government of (28) Projects of respondent No.4 by the Agencies viz., HMDA, TSIIC and the District Collectors concerned shown against the projects in Annexure enclosed and also authorized the concerned agencies to prepare and finalize the modalities for auction. Vide letter dated 27.01.2022, the Special Chie
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
