Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M. MOHIUDDIN, APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ.
Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology – Appellant
Versus
S. Kondaparthi Manvitha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. attendance shortfall due to medical reasons. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. need for merit consideration in attendance requirements. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. regulations cannot permit exceptions in judicial review. (Para 6 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. judgment affirming university attendance regulations. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. permits readmission while upholding academic standards. (Para 12 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri R.Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Sri T.Srikanth Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1; Sri M.Vamshi Kiran Yadav, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education Department, appearing for respondent No.2 and Sri Peri Prabhakar, learned Standing Counsel for the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, appearing for respondent No.3.
2. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 29.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.16472 of 2025, whereby the learned writ court has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein (hereinafter referred to as “the writ petitioner”).
3. The writ petitioner is a student of Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science and Engineering (B.Tech (CSE)) III Year in the appellants’ college (who are respondent Nos.3 to 5 in the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
