Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Vudugula Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract workers' regularization and employment status (Para 1) |
| 2. jurisdiction of respondent no. 2 in employment matters (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioners' employment status and company defenses (Para 3) |
| 4. jurisdiction and obligation of labour commissioner (Para 4) |
| 5. legal arguments on esi rights and employment conditions (Para 5 , 6) |
| 6. court's assessment of alleged procedural irregularities (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 7. discrimination and violation of labour laws (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 8. denial of fair process and arbitrary action (Para 13) |
| 9. court's directive for relief and reconsideration (Para 14) |
| 10. closure of miscellaneous applications (Para 15) |
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
The case of petitioners is that they joined the service of Respondent No.3 company through Respondent No. 4 provider of contract labourers, between 2008 and 2014. At the time of their appointment, Respondent No. 4 assured that they would soon be transferred to the rolls of Respondent No. 3 as casual and permanent employees, however, despite several Long-Term Settlements dated 17.08.2006, 20.04.2009, 16.10.2012, 05.10.2018 and 27.04.2022, whereunder other contract workers were regularized as permanent employees of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
