IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN
A. Revanth Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
1. The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Surakhsa Sanhita (hereinafter ‘BNSS’) to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 312 of 2024 by setting aside the order dated 23.08.2024 in the said C.C. passed by Principal Special Judicial First-Class Magistrate for Excise Cases at Hyderabad (hereinafter ‘Trial Court’).
2. Heard Mr. T. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner - Accused, Mr. Devineni Vijay Kumar, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. Hamsa Devineni, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 - Complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
3.1. The Petitioner herein is the Chief Minister for the State of Telangana and is a member of the Indian National Congress, a national political party. Respondent No. 2 (hereinafter ‘the Complainant’) is the Bharatiya Janata Party (Telangana) represented by its General Secretary Mr. Kasam Venkateshwarlu. It claims to be the State Unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party, also a national political party.
3.2. Respondent No. 2 had filed a complaint dated 10.05.2024 under Sections 199 and 200 of the Code
Manoj Narula v. Union of India
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
Aroon Purie v. State of NCT of Delhi
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.