Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mulukala Kanakamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J.
This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company, aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 22.03.2021 in M.V.O.P.No.976 of 2011 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”).
2. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The case of the petitioners before the Tribunal is that on 25.12.2010 at about 6:10 a.m., the deceased was going to Thandur on vehicle bearing No.AP-28W-6218 as a Supervisor-cum- representative of owner of the goods i.e., coal which was being transported from Kothagudem to Thandur, and the vehicle reached NH-9, the driver of the said vehicle has driven it in a rash and negligent manner at a high speed and dashed to a lorry which was already stranded across the road, as a result of which the deceased sustained head injuries and died.
4. The respondent No.1 filed counter denying the averments of the petition with regard to the occurrence of the accident, age, avocation and income of the deceased. It is further contended that the deceased used to work as Supervisor-cum-cleaner of lor
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
