Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN
Mandadi Sulochana – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Tribunal for Maintenance and Welfare of Parents – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial facts and events leading to the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's claims and background context. (Para 5 , 6 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. arguments from the respondents. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal analysis based on section 23 of the act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court highlights importance and purpose of the act. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 6. concerns about misuse of the act. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 7. final order of the court. (Para 35 , 36) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri Ravinder Samala, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. G.Vijayakumari, learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare Department, appearing for 1st respondent, Mr. Shiv Shanker Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and Mr. T.Vijay Hanuman Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 7.
2. Respondent No.3 filed application under Section 4 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Seniors Citizens Act, 2007 (for short ‘the Act’) before 2nd respondent to cancel the registered gift settlement deeds bearing document Nos.6087 and 6088 of 2012 both dated 23.04.2012 and also to pay maintenance in terms of order dated 29.01.2021 in I.A.No.1 of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
