Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Dyanaboina Kalamma – Appellant
Versus
Manikanta Parboiled Rice Industries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for compensation due to fatal accident. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's denial of liability. (Para 5 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. calculation of loss of income and dependency. (Para 7 , 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. assessment of consortium claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. order to enhance compensation and interest. (Para 22 , 24 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J.
This M.A.C.M.A. is filed by the appellants/petitioners under Section 173 of M.V.Act against the Award and decree passed by the II Additional Chief Judge – cum - Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.2438 of 2017, dated 17.01.2020, seeking compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- on account of the death of Dyanaboina Chinna Narsaiah (hereinafter referred to as “deceased”) in an accident that occurred on 23.08.2017.
2. For convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that appellant/claimants earlier filed M.V.O.P.No.2438 of 2017 under Section 166 of the M.V.Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of the deceased, who died in the accident alleged to have caused due
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
