Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Samineni Sunitha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details surrounding the motor vehicle accident and claims. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. establishing the circumstances of the accident and claimant's entitlements. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT :
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J.
This M.A.C.M.A is filed under Section 173 of M.V.Act, 1988 by the Appellant/Insurance Company/respondent No.3 against the Award and decree passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum- V-Additional District Judge, Kothagudum, (hereinafter referred to ‘learned Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.33 of 2016, dated 13.06.2019, wherein claimant filed the claim petition under Section 166 of M.V.Act seeking compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- on account of death of claimants mother i.e., Thota Papamma, (herein after referred as ‘deceased’) who died in Motor Vehicle accident occurred on 25.12.2015.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that claimant filed M.V.O.P.No.33 of 2016 under Section 166 of the M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the death of the deceased, who died in the accident alleged to have caused due to rash and negligent manner of the Motorcycle
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
