Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Karnam Padma W/o Late Karnam Jagadish – Appellant
Versus
K. Naveen Kumar S/o K. Yadagiri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case filing and party identification (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the accident and claim (Para 3) |
| 3. responses from parties regarding allegations (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. framed issues for trial (Para 6) |
| 5. tribunal's awarded compensation (Para 8) |
| 6. arguments of both parties regarding compensation (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. points for consideration in appeal (Para 12) |
| 8. discussion on entitlement for compensation (Para 13) |
| 9. order to modify compensation amount (Para 14) |
| 10. final decision of the court (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J.
1. This appeal is filed by the claimant, aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 19.04.2021 in M.V.O.P.No.2675 of 2014 passed by the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”).
2. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The case of the petitioner before the Tribunal is that on 22.05.2014 at about 2.30 p.m., the deceased was going as a pillion rider on a motor bike bearing No.AP-28-BS-9260 along with one Vivek Bharathi, while P. Sai Kumar was riding the said bike belonging to one Naveen Kumar/res
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
