Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Devireddy Sukumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Tejaswini Reddy Beerapu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. temporary anti-suit injunction sought. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court's conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 2 , 12) |
| 3. defendant's arguments against indian jurisdiction. (Para 3) |
| 4. court upholds anti-suit injunction under certain conditions. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 5. criteria for granting temporary injunction. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 6. distinction of cited cases from current matter. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
1. The plaintiff-wife filed the Suit i.e. O.S.No.3 of 2024 before the Court of Principal Family Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, for granting temporary anti-Suit injunction against the defendant-husband, restraining the defendant from proceeding and further participating in the proceedings in Case No.24-104453-DO on the file of Hon’ble Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, Family Division, State of Michigan, United States of America, and restraining the defendant from filing any other Suit or Petition in any other State in USA and country/countries. In the said Suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.666 of 2024, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), read with Section 151 of the CPC, praying the Court to restrain the defendant from initia
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
