SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 1246

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Avinash Reddy Paladugu – Appellant
Versus
The Bureau of Immigration (BOI) and Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 515 of 2024
Decided On : 26-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Katika Ravinder Reddy
For the Respondent: T. Sudhakar Reddy

The issuance of Look Out Circulars must adhere to strict procedural guidelines and cannot infringe on personal liberty without compelling reasons.

Headnote:(A) Guidelines for Issuance of Look Out Circulars - The consolidated guidelines established protocols for issuing Look Out Circulars (LOCs) for Indian citizens and foreigners, emphasizing that LOCs must stem from cognizable offences under IPC or other laws and must be supported by proper justification. (Paras 3, 8, 11, 14)

(B) Personal Liberty - The Court emphasized that the right to travel abroad is part of personal liberty and should not be deprived without due process, especially in non-cognizable cases. It further affirmed that LOCs cannot be mechanistically issued but must justify exceptional circumstances. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

(C) Duty of Authorities - The Court noted the obligation of authorities under Section J of the Office Memorandum to regularly review LOCs, arguing that failure to do so highlights abuse of authority. (Paras 10, 14)

(D) Relevant Case Laws - Previous judgments cited established the presumption of innocence and necessity of compelling reasons for restricting personal liberties, and reinforced that criminal proceedings should not hinder a person's fundamental rights. (Paras 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the legality of a Look Out Circular issued against him in connection with a matrimonial dispute case involving accusations of domestic violence and dowry, which resulted in a registered FIR and subsequent LOC despite the petitioner's willingness to cooperate.

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled that the LOC against the petitioner was issued improperly, violating both personal liberty and procedural guidelines, leading to the order to withdraw the LOC.

Issues: The primary issues included whether the LOC was issued in accordance with legal protocols and whether the petitioner’s right to travel had been violated.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the issuance of LOC did not meet the necessary legal requirements, determining that the petitioner was not a flight risk and that all feasible measures for cooperation had not been exhausted.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, LOC quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenging issuance of look out circular (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding procedural irregularities (Para 3 , 6 , 7)
3. court’s analysis on issuance and application of loc (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. judicial decisions regarding personal liberty and loc (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. conclusion directing withdrawal of loc (Para 16)

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, Mr Gadi Praveen, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr T. Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3.

2. Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :

This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing Look Out Circular against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad, as illegal and contrary to law and an abuse of authority and process of law, and consequently, direct the Respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner based on Crime No. 211 of 2023, dated 07.04.2023, on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad.

3. PERUSED THE RECORD :

A. Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021 dealing with consolidated guidelines for issuance of Look Out Circular in respect of Indian Citizens and Foreigners and the relevant paras of the said A, B, C, D, H, I , J, and L, of the said circular are extracted hereunder:

“6. The existing guidelines with regard to issuance of Look Out Circulars (LOC) in respect of Indian citizens and foreigners have been reviewed by this Ministry. After due deliberations in consultation with various stakeholders and in supersession of all the existing guidelines issued vide this Ministry’s letters/O.M. referred to in para 1 above, it has been decided with the approval of the competent authority that the following consolidated guidelines shall be followed henceforth by all concerned for the purpose of issuance of Look Out Circulars (LOC) in respect of Indian citizens and foreigners:-

A. The request for opening an LOC would be made by the Originating Agency (OA) to the Deputy Director, Bureau of Immigration (BoI), East Block – VIII, R.K. Puram, New Delhi – 110066 (Telefax: 011- 26192883, email:boihq@nic.in) in the enclosed proforma.

B. The request for opening of LOC must invariably be issued with the approval of an Originating Agency that shall be an officer not below the rank of –

(i) Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or

(ii) Joint Secretary in the State Government; or

(iii) District Magistrate of the District concerned; or

(iv) Superintendent of Police

(SP) of the District concerned; or

(v) SP in CBI or an officer of equivalent level working in CBI; or

(vi) Zonal Director in Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) or an officer of equivalent level (including Assistant Director (Ops) in Headquarters of NCB]; or

(vii) Deputy Commissioner or an officer of equivalent level in the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence or Central Board of Direct Taxes or Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs; or

(viii) Assistant Director of Intelligence Bureau/Bureau of Immigration (BoI); or

(ix) Deputy Secretary of Research and Analysis Wing (R&A W); or

(x) An officer not below the level of Superintendent of Police in National Investigation Agency; or

(xi) Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate; or

(xii) Protector of Emigrants in the office of the Protectorate of Emigrants or an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India; or

(xiii) Designated officer of Interpol; or

(xiv) An officer of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Corporate Affairs not below the rank of Additional Director (in the rank of Director in the Government of India); or

(xv) Chairman/Managing Directors/Chief Executive of all Public Sector Banks.”

C. LOCs can also be issu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top