Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. VENUGOPAL
Maddhi Divakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for writ of mandamus (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's analysis and direction for fresh notice (Para 3 , 7 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. contentions on land ownership and prior objections (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. litigation history and court's past order (Para 6) |
| 5. respondent's position on survey contention (Para 8) |
| 6. government's compliance with survey procedures (Para 11) |
| 7. conclusion and order of the court (Para 13) |
ORDER :
E.V. VENUGOPAL, J.
These writ petitions are filed seeking the following prayer:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring and setting aside the proceedings in Proc.No. A4/2339/2024 dated 22.10.2025 on the file of the 4th Respondent, proposing to conduct survey and demarcation of lands in Sy. Nos.4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 41/9, 41/10, 41/11 and 41/12 admeasuring Ac.26.14 guntas situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District on 29.10.2025 without considering the objections/ representation made by petitioners on 24.10.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the 4th Respondent to consider the objections/ representation made by the petitioners on 24.10.2025 and thereafter take decision regarding the application made by th
Landowners must be afforded the opportunity to make objections against proposed surveys affecting their properties, and surveys must comply with established legal procedures.
Authorities must adhere to procedural rules when conducting land surveys, ensuring that objections are addressed in a reasoned manner as directed by the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
