Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Nagesh Bheemapaka
Bhargavi Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
Petitioner challenges the action of Respondents 3 and 4, in selecting and empanelling Respondents 5 to 10 in the List of Out Sourcing Agencies, Suryapet District (2025-26) in contravention of tender eligibility conditions of Tender Notice dated 13.06.2025 and consequentially allotting Respondents 5 to 10 to the needy government departments for outsourcing work by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings dated 20.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unfair, against the tender rules and conditions and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; consequently, to set aside the list of Outsourcing Agencies, Suryapet District (2025-26) to the extent of the Respondent Nos. S to 10 and also to set aside the consequential orders of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings dated 20.08.2025.
2. The case of petitioner is that it is a duly registered outsourcing agency, having been established in 2016, and has been providing manpower to various Government Departments in Suryapet District for several years. It claims to possess all valid statutory registrations, including labour licence, EPF, ESI, GST and professional tax registrations and asserts that it has been
Tender processes should be governed by transparency and fairness; inclusion of agencies lacking formal criteria is permissible if justified by equal treatment and no arbitrariness or mala fides is de....
The court held that absence of statutory obligation for contract renewal negated claims of legitimate expectation, affirming that the empanelment process was transparent and legally compliant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
