Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Sis. Boyapati Velangini Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of a criminal petition. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's defense and arguments. (Para 4) |
| 3. prosecution's stance and requirements. (Para 5) |
| 4. procedural requirements for complaints. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's decision to quash proceedings. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings against her in C.C.No.2998 of 2024 on the file of learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at L.B. Nagar, registered for the offences under Sections 223 and 292 of BNS .
2. Heard Sri Arpith Joy Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. The case of prosecution is that the petitioner has used DJ music band without any permission and caused noise pollution and disturbance in the locality.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the Principal of St. Pious X Degree and PG College for Women and that she has not committed any such offence to attract Sections 223 and 292 of BNS . He further submitted that the petitioner has advi
A complaint under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita must be lodged by an authorized public servant, failing which the court cannot take cognizance, rendering continued proceedings an abuse o....
Separate FIRs for different incidents are justified and not a basis for quashing proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
