................ vs ................ - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1620

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1620

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
................ – Appellant
Versus
................ – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRIKANTHA CHARI
For the Respondent: N.SRIDHAR REDDY

Table of Content
1. appeal challenging divorce decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. allegations of cruelty and desertion. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11)
3. evidence presented by both parties. (Para 12 , 13 , 19)
4. human behavior and cruelty definition. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
5. irretrievable breakdown of marriage. (Para 25 , 26)
6. duration of separation links to dissolution. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
7. complaints and allegations impact on relationship. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. consideration of evidence and its implications. (Para 35 , 36)
9. lack of possibility for reconciliation. (Para 41 , 42)
10. child's maintenance awarded. (Para 45 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

1. Heard Sri P. Ravi Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri Srikantha Chari, learned counsel for the Appellant/wife and Sri N. Sridhar Reddy learned counsel for the respondent/husband.

2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 25.03.2015 in OP No.1006 of 2008 (old OP No.83 of 2006) passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, L.B. Nagar, Rangareddy District granting decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage dated 06.08.2000.

3. The appellant is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The Respondent -