................ vs ................ - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1550

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1550

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
................ – Appellant
Versus
................ – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M V B S NARASIMHA ANUDEEP
For the Respondent: SAKINALA RAVI KUMAR

Table of Content
1. grounds for divorce and counterclaims (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. evidence and testimony about allegations (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 19)
3. cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
4. permanent alimony and maintenance considerations (Para 33 , 36 , 40)

JUDGMENT :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

1. We have heard Sri Sritharam, learned counsel representing Sri M.V.B.S. Narasimha Anudeep, learned counsel for the Appellant - wife. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the Respondent - husband.

2. The Family Court Appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 16.06.2014 in F.C.O.P No.262 of 2010 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum- III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Warangal granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the parties held on 28.05.2005.

3. The appellant is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The Respondent - husband filed the aforesaid FCOP No. 262 of 2010 under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955, against the appellant – wife seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion contending as follows:

i. His marriage with the appellant