Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK
V.Srujana – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's facts regarding selection and termination (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against cancellation of employment (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural fairness and medical examination standards (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal principles regarding termination without notice (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's final decision on reinstatement and conditions (Para 13) |
ORDER :
Heard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned senior counsel, representing Sri M.Krupakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-III appearing for respondent No.1, Sri S.Bhoopal Reddy, learned Standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 4, and Sri Nayakwadi Ramesh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3.
3) Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was selected and appointed vide proceedings dated 25.07.2024 after undergoing due process of selection. Therefore, respondent No.2 cannot cancel petitioner’s posting and appointment orders directly without issuing any notice. It is further contended that the petitioner was sent to Government ENT Hospital, Hyderabad, for medical examination
Termination of appointments based on disability certification must adhere to principles of natural justice, and any arbitrary action lacking notice is unlawful.
The statutory disability certificate issued under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act prevails over general medical assessments, ensuring the rights of individuals with disabilities in public....
The use of fraudulent documentation for securing employment constitutes grave misconduct, warranting dismissal rather than mere discharge.
The court affirmed the importance of valid disability certificates and the necessity of adhering to established benchmarks for disability in employment decisions.
The termination of an employee based on medical unfitness is contrary to the protections established under disability laws, requiring adjustments or supernumerary positions for disabled employees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
