Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Viamoka – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:-
“declaring the action of the Respondents and their subordinates interfering into the business activities of the Petitioner without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution consequently direct the Respondents and their subordinates not to interfere with the business activities of the Petitioner being run in the name and style as ‘VIAMOKA’ situated at Sy.No.222/4 and 222/7, Govt Janwada, Janwada, Shankarpalle, Ranga Reddy District (subject premises)....”
3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner claims to be owner of a café viz. ‘VIAMOKA’ located in the subject premises. It is submitted the said café is covered with CCTV Cameras and smoking area is separate from general café space and that petitioner possess all the licenses such as trade, food and labour licenses. It is further submitted that respondent Police
Interference by authorities in business activities must comply with due process; businesses need to meet licensing requirements under public health laws before operating smoking areas.
Legal interference by authorities with business operations must comply with due process and existing legal provisions, ensuring rights under the Constitution are upheld.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
