Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
JUVVADI SRIDEVI
B. Sujani – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Juvvadi Sridevi, J.
These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.68 of 2024 on the file of the learned III Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 were alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 506 of IPC, while the petitioners-accused Nos.4 and 5 were alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 of IPC and Sections3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. Since both the criminal petitions are arising out of C.C.No.68 of 2024, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.
3. Heard Mr. P.Animi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State. There is no representation for respondent No.2-de facto complainant. Perused the record.
4. The petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 4 are the mother, father and sister of accused No.1. The petitioner-accused No.5 is the husband of the petitioner-accused No.4. As per the averments in the compl
The court emphasized the necessity for specific allegations in matrimonial disputes to prevent the misuse of legal provisions, holding that vague accusations do not justify trial against accused fami....
Specific allegations are necessary for criminal charges in matrimonial disputes to prevent misuse of legal processes, as vague accusations do not meet the threshold for prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
