Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Mothe Chandra Shekar Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Juvvadi Sridevi, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 3 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.3871 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal (for short ‘trial Court’). The offences alleged against the petitioner- accused No.1 are under Sections 420, 417, 498-A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’), whereas the offences alleged against the petitioner-accused No.3 are under Sections 498-A and 506 of IPC.
2. Heard Mr. Srinivas Emani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State. Inspite of service of notice, there is no representation for respondent No.2-de facto complainant. Perused the record.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the petitioner-accused No.1 is the husband of the de facto complainant and petitioner-accused No.3 is his son. The marriage between the petitioner-accused No.1 and the de facto complainant was solemnized on
Specific allegations are necessary for criminal charges in matrimonial disputes to prevent misuse of legal processes, as vague accusations do not meet the threshold for prosecution.
The court emphasized the necessity for specific allegations in matrimonial disputes to prevent the misuse of legal provisions, holding that vague accusations do not justify trial against accused fami....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
