Sadabathula Dasharatham vs Shaik Siraj Ahmed - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1716

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1716

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Sadabathula Dasharatham – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Siraj Ahmed – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K Venumadhav
For the Respondent: K Venkateshwara Prasad

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and grounds for revising trial court orders. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 8)
2. limits of high court's supervisory powers. (Para 10 , 16)

ORDER :

B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, J.

1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the Order passed in I.A.No.302 of 2021 in OS No.9 of 2017 by the learned Junior Civil Judge -Cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Korutla, Jagtial District in dismissing the application filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner vide order dated 04.07.2022.

2. Petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendant Nos.1 to 4 in the suit vide OS.No.9 of 2017.

3.1. Petitioner has filed I.A.No.302 of 2021 under Order 26 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to fix the boundaries of suit Survey No.798 with the help of Mandal Surveyor or any other Superior Officer.

3.2. It is stated in the affidavit in IA.No.302 of 2021 that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the open land admeasuring Ac.00-09 guntas in Survey No. situated at Korutla Shivaru and within the limits of Korutla Revenue Mandal, Jagtial District and the respondents-defenda