................ vs ................ - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1717

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1717

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
................ – Appellant
Versus
................ – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ahmed Ehtesham Kawkab
For the Respondent: Shaikh Mohammed Rizwan Akhtar

JUDGMENT:

K. Lakshman, J.

Heard Mr.Ahmed Ehtesham Kawkab, learned counsel for the appellant/husband and Mr.Shaikh Mohammed Rizwan Akhtar, learned counsel for the respondent/wife.

2. In all the three appeals, appellant is the husband and respondent is the wife. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was performed on 04.11.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is an arranged marriage. It is the specific contention of the appellant/husband that immediately after the marriage, respondent joined his company, but not accepted to have consummation of marriage on the very first night. On the intervention of the elders and well-wishers, the same was performed later on. Further, without the knowledge of the appellant, respondent got aborted the pregnancy. Respondent used to harass the appellant without cooperating him and not attending the house hold works. She used to quarrel on each and every petty matter without having any reason.

3. Respondent left the house of the appellant in his absence to her parents’ house on 30.05.2012 along with all her belongings without informing the appellant. Though he visited the respondent parents’ house, she used to threaten him that he shall not v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document