Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA
Hakim Peer Akber, Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of fraud and forgery in a loan scheme. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense arguments regarding petitioner's innocence vs. prosecution's evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. determination of severity of allegations and bail denial. (Para 7) |
| 4. final ruling on the dismissal of the bail petition. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
K. Sujana, J.
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 by the petitioner/A.6 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.72 of 2025 of CCS Police Station, DD, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 316 (2), 318(4), 336(3) and 340(2) r/w.61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The facts of the case are that a complaint was lodged by the complainant on 18.06.2025 stating that he was one of the directors of M/s. Trilliance Builders Pvt. Ltd., located at Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad. The complaint was against one Selva Kumar and Sunil Kumar (Directors), Shankar-personal Assistant to Sunil Kumar, Mrs. Radhika, and Sudhakar- marketing executives of Smart Investment Solutions, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. On 05.12.2023, Sunil Kumar was introduced at the Hyderabad office by Sriniv
The court emphasizes that the severity of fraud allegations justifies the denial of bail in cases involving potential flight risk and witness tampering.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
