SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1773

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, JJ.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX – Appellant 
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX – Respondent 
Family Court Appeal Nos.180 of 2014 and 10 of 2015
Decided On : 30-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P V SRINIVASA RAO
For the Respondent: S SURENDER REDDY

Dissolution of marriage granted due to established cruelty; significant enhancement of alimony reflects the welfare of children and the wife's contributions.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)(ia) - Claim for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty - Husband filed petition based on the wife's repeated suicide attempts and abusive behavior - Evidence supported claims of cruelty and neglect - Decree of divorce granted with enhanced alimony of Rs.20,00,000/- awarded to the wife. (Paras 6, 15, 18)

(B) Permanent Alimony - Considered the welfare of children and the wife's role in their upbringing - Initial amount ordered was Rs.10,00,000/-, later enhanced to Rs.20,00,000/- to reflect ongoing support needs. (Para 18)

Facts of the case:
The parties were married on 10.05.1999 and have two children. Husband alleged repeated attempts of wife to commit suicide and cruelty, leading to his petition for divorce. The Family Court granted a decree of divorce and awarded alimony.

Findings of Court:
The Family Court's decision was upheld, with the alimony increased to Rs.20,00,000/- considering the welfare of the children and the wife.

Issues: Court addressed whether evidence established the husband's claims of cruelty and the appropriate amount of alimony for the wife post-divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the cumulative evidence substantiated the claims of cruelty, justifying the dissolution of marriage and the enhanced alimony, emphasizing the wife's role in child-rearing and upcoming responsibilities.

Result: Both Family Court Appeals disposed of; alimony enhanced to Rs.20,00,000/-.

Table of Content
1. court's analysis and findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 7 , 18)
2. grounds for divorce established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 15)
3. evidence of cruelty and suicide attempts. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14)
4. maintenance awarded to wife and children. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final decision and order of enhanced alimony. (Para 17 , 19)

ORDER :

K.LAKSHMAN, J.

Even today there is no representation on behalf of the appellant in F.C.A.No.180 of 2014 and respondent in F.C.A.No.10 of 2015 i.e., the husband.

2. We have heard Sri K.Uday Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for respondent in F.C.A.No.180 of 2014 and appellant in F.C.A.No.10 of 2015 i.e., the wife.

3. The husband filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide F.C.O.P. No. 40 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty contending that his marriage with the wife was performed on 10.05.1999 as per Hindu rites and customs. It was an arranged marriage, and they were blessed with two children, one son and one daughter. At the time of marriage, he was working as an Industrial Promotion Officer. When he was posted at Madhira in the year 2002, the wife, without any reason, used to become furious and attempted to stab herself with a knife, but he prevented her. She again attempted to commit suicide several times and started blackmailing him over petty issues. During her pregnancy, she used to stay with her parents, and when he went there to take care of her welfare, she disliked it. On one occasion, she attempted to commit suicide by consuming mosquito repellent liquid. She was admitted to the hospital and discharged after two days. The said incident occurred in the year 2003. After the birth of their son, he was transferred to Karimnagar and started living with his parents. However, the wife did not join him and demanded that they live separately from his parents. She again attempted to commit suicide by tying a saree to the ceiling fan and trying to hang herself. On one occasion, she requested him not to attend the marriage function of his brother-in-law’s sister. When he attended the marriage, she took their son in her arms and stood in front of the parents’ house. A friend of his, Sri B. Tirupathi, convinced her and sent her back home. Thereafter, he shifted his residence to another house at Ramnagar. The wife gave birth to a daughter but never allowed him to take the children to his parents’ house. She was addicted to television serials and neglected the children. There were also disputes between them on the ground that he failed to bring non-vegetarian food and alcohol for her father. She used to insist that he has to hand over his entire salary to her, and when he refused, she beat and kicked him. She also removed the gas pipeline of the cylinder and tried to kill their daughter. She frequently abused him in filthy language and subjected him to cruelty. On these grounds, he sought dissolution of the marriage.

4. The wife filed a counter in the aforesaid F.C.O.P. denying the allegations made by the husband. According to her, she never subjected the husband to cruelty as alleged. It was the husband who provoked her to commit suicide, and she tolerated all his acts keeping in view the welfare and future of both the children.

5. To prove the said cruelty, the husband examined himself as PW-1, his relative as PW-2, and his friend as PW-3. He filed Ex.P1 – Marriage Photograph, Ex.P2 – FIR in Crime No.72 of 2010 of Women Police Station, Karimnagar, and Ex.P3 – Copy of the Charge Sheet. Opposing the said petition, the wife examined herself as RW-1 and her relative as RW-2.

6. On consideration of the entire evidence, both oral and documentary, the learned Family Court, vide impugned order dated 14.07.2014, granted a decree of divorce and directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- towards permanent alimony

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top