IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.Sujana
Sania Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Shahed Baba – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the cases and facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments for increased maintenance (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondent's arguments defending maintenance amount (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis on maintenance amount (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. controversies in the claims of both parties (Para 11) |
| 6. court's final decision and dismissal of petitions (Para 13) |
ORDER :
K. Sujana, J.
Since the issue involved in these criminal revision cases is one and the same, they are being heard together and are being decided by way of this common order.
2. Since the parties in both cases are one and the same, they are hereinafter referred to as in M.C.No.262 of 2022.
3. Crl.R.C.No.662 of 2023 is filed by the petitioner - wife aggrieved by the order dated 14.09.2023 passed in M.C.No.262 of 2022 by the learned Judge, Principal Family Court-cum-XIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
4. Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2024 is filed by the respondent - husband aggrieved by the order dated 14.09.2023 passed in M.C.No.262 of 2022 by the learned Judge, Principal Family Court-cum-XIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
5. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, wi
Maintenance decisions involve assessing the financial capacity of both spouses, the needs of dependents, and the evidence supporting claims of neglect or financial ability.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.