SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1867

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
M.Navneeth Chowdary – Appellant 
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 29513 of 2024
Decided On : 17-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

Educational institutions cannot withhold Transfer Certificates for financial dues; such actions violate established legal principles.

Headnote:This Court analyzed the petition under Writ Petition No.29513 of 2024 concerning the unlawful withholding of a Transfer Certificate by educational authorities despite the completion of due payments and examinations. The petitioner, having completed the B.A. LL.B. course, argued that the refusal to issue the Transfer Certificate was based on ungrounded financial dues. The Court affirmed prior rulings that certificates cannot be withheld for financial reasons, citing UGC guidelines and previous judgments reinforcing that educational institutions cannot retain students' documents and must allow freedom to transfer. The petition is allowed directing the issuance of the Transfer Certificate within one week without costs.

Table of Content
1. right to transfer certificate without financial obstruction. (Para 3)
2. precedent against withholding certificates for dues. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal duty to issue certificates post-review. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

ORDER :

1. Heard party-in-person, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri P.Bhanu Prakash, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. The party-in-person approached this Court seeking the prayer as under:

“…..to pass an Order or Orders Directions or a Writ or more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned actions of Respondent Nos.2 and 4 in not considering Representation Dt 14.09.2024 as illegal and consequently direct Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider and pass a decision on Representation Dt 14.09.2024 or in the alternative declare the instructions of Respondent No. 4 to get No Dues from Respondent No. 3 despite the petitioner being a Non-boarder as illegal and pass….”

3. The case of the petitioner in brief as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present Writ Petition is as under:-

The Petitioner pursued the B.A. LL.B (Self-Finance) Course at the University College of Law, Kakatiya University, Warangal (Subedari), during the 2019–2024 batch. The Petitioner paid all dues and successfully completed the course. The Petitioner was neither a hostel boarder nor a scholarship holder at the College of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and had never obtained a mess card at any point during the study period.

It is further the case of the petitioner that after payment of the entire tuition fee, Respondent No. 3 issued the hall ticket for the 10th Semester Examinations held in August 2024 and subsequently published the results. Following the instructions of Respondent No. 3, the Petitioner obtained the necessary attestations on the No-Due Certificate from the Library, Accounts, and NSS Sections. Upon informing the Hon’ble Vice- Chancellor regarding the delay, the office staff of Respondent No. 3 endorsed that the Petitioner was a non-boarder, affixed the seal of the Director of Hostels, and directed the Petitioner to approach Respondent No. 3 for signature. However, Respondent No. 3 wilfully and illegally refused to sign the No-Due Certificate on the ground that the Petitioner had lodged a complaint against Respondent No.3 before the Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor.

Consequently, the Respondents withheld the Transfer Certificate (T.C.) of the Petitioner.

It is further the case of the petitioner that Respondent No. 4 also refused to issue the Transfer Certificate on the pretext that the No-Due Certificate signed by Respondent No. 3 had not been submitted, and coerced the Petitioner into giving an undertaking dated 17.09.2024 to that effect. The Petitioner thereafter issued a legal notice dated 19.09.2024 through RPAD (Consignment Nos. RN130852605IN and RN130852614IN), and called upon the respondents to issue the Transfer Certificate within seven (7) working days, however, no action had been taken by the respondnets. Aggrieved by the arbitrary, illegal, and vindictive actions of the Respondents, the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition before this Hon’ble Court.

4. PERUSED THE RECORD - This Court decided a similar issue vide its judgment, dated 08.10.2025, passed in W.P.No.25952 of 2025. This Court opines that the Transfer Certificate of the petitioner cannot be withheld by the 4th respondent under any pretext.

5. The High Court of Madras in K. Palanisamy Vs. Correspondent, Vidya Vikash Matriculation School and Others of Madurai Bench in WP (MD) 20726 of 2019 decided on 17.10.2019 reported in MANU/TN/6538/2019, held that certificates of students could not be held back by educational institutions citing financial dues.

6. In the judgment of the High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench in S. Muthukamatchi vs. The Director of Technical Education, Anna University an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top