Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Swamy Viveknanda Educational Trust – Appellant
Versus
Assessment Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. demand challenged based on previous approvals and assessment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for stay application not addressed adequately. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. order remitted for re-evaluation of stay application. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER:
Mr. Vijhay K Punna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3 through video conferencing.
“GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
To Swamy Vivekananda Educational Trust Sy.No.288 and 289, Aushapur Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Hyderabad, Medchal Malkajgiri 500059, Telangana |
Madam/M/s,
Sub: Decision on Stay Application – Request for Partial Payment – Reg.
After carefully examining all relevant facts and circumstances of your case, and also considering the recent order of the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s. The General and Technical Education Society (IA No.1 of 2025 in WP No.12728 of 2025) and also considering the Hon’ble High Court of Telangana order in the case of Zoos and Parks Authority of Telangana v. CIT (E) (2024) 467 ITR 235 (Telangana) (HC), your stay application has been considered.
Please note that if you fail to comply with this directive by the due date, the Assessing Of
The Income Tax authority must address all specific grounds presented in a stay application thoughtfully and thoroughly.
The court affirmed that a stay of tax demand requires compelling proof of financial hardship, emphasizing that mere appeal pendency does not guarantee automatic relief.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
