Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V.VENUGOPAL
Palem Krishna Goud – Appellant
Versus
Government Of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for title mutation discussed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of property ownership disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's evaluation of claims based on evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. conclusion and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 24.03.2025, requesting mutation of his name in the revenue records, issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds, and conducting a survey in respect of land measuring Acs.20.13 guntas in Sy. Nos. 275 and 290 of Bagh Hayathnagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter will be referred to as ‘subject property’), as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard Sri M.Venkateswer Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that originally, one Smt. T. Saraswati Bai was the pattadar/landowner of the subject property. However, the names of one Sri Doulath Singh and the said T. Saraswati Bai we
The lack of clear title in claims for property mutation must be resolved through proper legal channels, not via writ petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
