IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
G.Shravan Kumar Reddy S/o.Late G.Prathap Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana represented by its – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion of parties' arguments. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. challenge to notice under municipal act. (Para 4) |
| 3. rules for regularization and their processing timelines. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. directions regarding processing and timely resolution. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. final directive for the ghmc to process application. (Para 12) |
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of respondent No.3 in issuing the impugned notice No.1075/ACP/TPS/C9B/CZ/GHMC/16, dated 16.01.2016 under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.152, dated 02.11.2015.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is owner and possessor of property bearing Municipal No.2-2-1075/14/A, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, admeasuring 461 square yards. Proposing to construct new building, the petitioner applied for permission by demolishing the old structure and the 2nd respondent accorded permission for construction of Stilt for parking plus 3 Upper floors vide Permit No.36749/DC/CZ/CIR-9/2014, dated 23.09.2014. He would further submit that the petitioner has commenced construction and completed the construction by the
The court mandates processing of pending applications for regularization of unauthorized constructions under specified timelines to uphold compliance with municipal regulations.
Judicial intervention is justified when administrative bodies delay the processing of applications, violating statutory requirements for timely decision-making.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.