G.Venkateshwarlu vs State of Telangana - 2026 Supreme(Telangana) 22

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Telangana) 22

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
G.Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri B.Mayur Reddy, learned senior designated counsel representing Smt. P.Chandana, learned counsel.
For the Respondents: G.P. for Services-I

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus to challenge arbitrary actions (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioner followed court decrees for land mutation (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments presented by the petitioner and respondents (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's concerns over potential bias in proceedings (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. quasi-judicial authority must act fairly (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. final relief granted to the petitioner (Para 18)

ORDER :

SUREPALLI NANDA, J.

Heard Sri B.Mayur Reddy, learned senior designated counsel representing Smt. Porika Chandana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on record and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer in W.P.No.19591 of 2022 as under:

“...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus” to call for records by ordering Rule Nisi in connection to initiating enquiry against the Petitioner by the Respondents more particularly the Respondent No. 3 by passing an Order dt 19.02.2020 in File No. A3/996/2020 by declaring their action as arbitrary, highhanded, discriminatory, ex-acie, illegal, in violation of princi