Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
G.Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri B.Mayur Reddy, learned senior designated counsel representing Smt. Porika Chandana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on record and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer in W.P.No.19591 of 2022 as under:
“...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus” to call for records by ordering Rule Nisi in connection to initiating enquiry against the Petitioner by the Respondents more particularly the Respondent No. 3 by passing an Order dt 19.02.2020 in File No. A3/996/2020 by declaring their action as arbitrary, highhanded, discriminatory, ex-acie, illegal, in violation of principles of natural justice, by giving colourable exercise to its statutory powers in dereliction of duty, and consequently may set-aside the same in the interest of justice and may pass...”
3. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer in W.P.No.41351 of 2022 as under:
“...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus” declaring the action of the Respondent No. 1 in pa
Disciplinary actions against a government employee must respect principles of natural justice and prior judicial orders, ensuring fairness and unbiased proceedings.
A mere error in jurisdiction without evidence of misconduct or personal gain cannot be termed as misconduct, making the employee liable to disciplinary proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
