Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
BNR Infra and Leasing – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by its Finance Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners failed to repay loan, leading to fraud allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. bank substantiated fraud claims against petitioners through documentation. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. court confirms legitimacy of fraud declaration and lack of arbitrariness. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed with no costs. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent No. 2 – Regional Manager, State Bank of India in classifying the account of petitioners as 'fraud' vide impugned declaration dated 02-11-2006 as illegal, arbitrary and to quash the consequential proceedings arising out of the impugned notification.
2. It is stated, petitioner No.1 is a partnership firm and is in the business of leasing and infrastructure development, more precisely construction of projects such as roads, dams, etcetera; it availed credit facility of Rupees Two Crores and a bank guarantee of Rupees One Crore on 22-07-2011 giving collateral security of open land admeasuring 16940 square yards (Acs.3.20 guntas) in Survey Nos.158 and 162 in Kismatpur Village and Gram Panchayat, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Rangareddy District which was purchased vide sale de
The classification of a loan account as 'fraud' based on forged documents is valid if it adheres to the existing regulatory framework and does not require a pre-decisional hearing.
Writ petitions must be dismissed if statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act are available and unutilized; fraud allegations require detailed examination beyond writ jurisdiction.
The SARFAESI Act provides a complete legal framework for secured creditors, ensuring that their actions are protected when conducted in good faith, and establishes that criminal proceedings cannot be....
High Courts should not entertain writ petitions challenging financial recovery proceedings under statutory frameworks when effective appellate or remedial forums are established, as these legislation....
Debt Recovery and monetary Laws - Defaulted in payment of instalments in respect of the overdraft facility - Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act and measures taken under Section 13(4) thereof were only nec....
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction to hear fraud allegations only when not covered by the DRT's jurisdiction in SARFAESI Act cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
