Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SARATH
Marripalli Rajeshwar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri B. Mangilal Naik, learned Government Pleader for Endowments for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri Ch. Satish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3.
2. This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings of the respondent No.2 in including the land of the petitioners admeasuring to an extent of Ac.7-09 gts in Sy.No.293 situated at Gopalpur Village, Dharmapuri Mandal, Karimnagar District in the property register under Section 43 of the Provisions of the Telangana Charitable Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the Act’) in the name of the respondent No.3- Temple as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Sections 45 and 43 of the Act and the Rules made there under and consequently set aside the proceedings in O.A.No.141 of 2008 on the file of the Endowments Tribunal filed by the respondent No.3 for eviction.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the grandfather of petitioners late Chandra Reddy @ Chandraiah was cultivated the agricultural lands and he was granted Protected Tenancy Certificate in respect of land admeasuring to an exten
The civil court's determination of property ownership takes precedence over eviction proceedings by the Endowments Tribunal, especially in light of concurrent appeals.
The High Court cannot entertain writ petitions related to land disputes already being adjudicated in specialized tribunals, directing parties to follow appropriate legal channels for resolution.
Without valid lease, mortgage, or license, continued possession of the property would render the person an encroacher under Sec. 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 83 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987 to resolve ownership disputes a....
Ownership disputes regarding endowment property should be resolved by the Endowments Tribunal, not through writ proceedings under Article 226.
Ownership disputes regarding lands belonging to religious institutions must be resolved through the Endowments Tribunal, making writ petitions under Article 226 inappropriate.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
