Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Athmakuri Rajamani – Appellant
Versus
Juttu Lachaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J.
Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by thelearned Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge at Karimnagar (hereinafter "Tribunal" for brevity) in M.V.O.P.No.703 of 2012 by order and decree dated 19.12.2017, the appellants/petitioners have filed the present appeal seekingenhancement of compensation.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants have filed the claim petition under Section 163 -A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short, ‘the Act’) before the Tribunal claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- from the respondents for the death of the deceased by name A.Lachaiah @ Devadas. Appellant No.1 is the wife and appellantNo.2 is the daughter of the deceased. On 31.10.2009, the deceased went to Vengalapet Village to attend the 21st day function of his relatives and after the said function while he was returning to Nancherla Village on his cycle; and when he reached at the outskirts of Vengalapet at 7:30 Р.М., R&B road culvert, respondent No.1 drove his Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle bearing No.AP-36-L-8462 (hereinafter ‘crime vehicle' for brevity) in a rash and negligent manner with high spee
Under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, compensation must adhere to a structured formula without requiring proof of negligence, with insurance liability confirmed even if the driver lacks a va....
Claimants cannot pursue simultaneous claims under Sections 163(A) and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act in the same petition; evidence must substantiate claims when seeking compensation.
Under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, claimants are not required to prove negligence; the onus lies on the insurer to establish any negligence to deny compensation.
A claimant with an income exceeding Rs. 40,000 per annum can file a claim petition under section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and receive compensation in accordance with the structured formu....
Compensation under Section 163A of the M.V. Act does not require proof of negligence, and structured compensation formulas must be applied to ensure fair awards to claimants.
The court clarified the distinction between claims under Sections 163-A and 166 of the MV Act, emphasizing the necessity of establishing negligence for appropriate compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
