Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
B.Rama Rao, S/o. Late B.Shankaraiah – Appellant
Versus
B.Nageswara Rao, S/o. Late B.Shankaraiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of civil revision petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims regarding gift deeds and alleged manipulation (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. nature of properties involved in the suit (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. amendment process and requirements under law (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. limitations on amendments to pleadings (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. requirements for seeking declaratory relief (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. factors influencing court's decision on amendments (Para 26 , 28 , 30) |
| 9. pervasiveness of flaws in the application (Para 29 , 31) |
| 10. conclusion and order of the court (Para 32 , 33) |
ORDER :
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
1. This Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order passed by the learned XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad in IA.No.792 of 2015 in OS.No.128 of 2007, dated 04.03.2022.
2. Petitioner is the respondent No.4-defendant No.4, respondent No.1 is the petitioner-plaintiff, respondent No.2 is respondent No.1-defendant No.1 in IA.No.792 of 2015 in OS.No.128 of 2007.
3. It is mentioned in the cause title of the CRP that respondent Nos.3 to 6-respondent Nos.2
The court emphasized strict adherence to limitation periods for amendments in civil suits and the necessity of including all consequential amendments as per procedural rules.
Amendments to pleadings are permissible under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC if they do not change the nature of the suit and are necessary for justice, even if filed after a delay.
The court established that amendments to pleadings are permissible to ensure justice and effective adjudication, provided they do not introduce time-barred claims or fundamentally change the nature o....
The court upheld the trial Court's discretion to allow amendments and addition of parties, emphasizing the necessity for effective adjudication and that the cause of action was continuous, thus not b....
Gift deed - Rejected the plaint - Limitation - Suit is barred by limitation in view of pleadings of appellant that he came to know about gift deeds only two days prior to filing of suit as such issue....
(1) Mohammedan Law – Gift (Hiba) – For a valid gift declaration by donor is must – A gift cannot be implied.(2) Amendment of plaint – It is always open to court to allow an amendment if it is of the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
