IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
B.Rama Rao, S/o. Late B.Shankaraiah – Appellant
Versus
B.Nageswara Rao, S/o. Late B.Shankaraiah – Respondent
ORDER :
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
1. This Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order passed by the learned XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad in IA.No.792 of 2015 in OS.No.128 of 2007, dated 04.03.2022.
2. Petitioner is the respondent No.4-defendant No.4, respondent No.1 is the petitioner-plaintiff, respondent No.2 is respondent No.1-defendant No.1 in IA.No.792 of 2015 in OS.No.128 of 2007.
3. It is mentioned in the cause title of the CRP that respondent Nos.3 to 6-respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6-defendant Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6 are not necessary parties.
4.1. Respondent No.1-petitioner stated in the affidavit (i.e. in IA.No.792 of 2015) that during the lift time of his mother (respondent No.2-defendant No.1) and before her demise, after filing the suit, defendant No.4 (petitioner herein) got executed various gift deeds involving most of the properties in his favour and to give a belief that he is making a fair play, got executed few gift deeds in favour of defendant Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6 (respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein) disproportionately when his mother was mentally and physically unstable to misappropr

Radhika Devi Vs. Bajrangi Singh and others
Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and others
The court emphasized strict adherence to limitation periods for amendments in civil suits and the necessity of including all consequential amendments as per procedural rules.
Amendments to pleadings are permissible under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC if they do not change the nature of the suit and are necessary for justice, even if filed after a delay.
The court established that amendments to pleadings are permissible to ensure justice and effective adjudication, provided they do not introduce time-barred claims or fundamentally change the nature o....
The court upheld the trial Court's discretion to allow amendments and addition of parties, emphasizing the necessity for effective adjudication and that the cause of action was continuous, thus not b....
Gift deed - Rejected the plaint - Limitation - Suit is barred by limitation in view of pleadings of appellant that he came to know about gift deeds only two days prior to filing of suit as such issue....
(1) Mohammedan Law – Gift (Hiba) – For a valid gift declaration by donor is must – A gift cannot be implied.(2) Amendment of plaint – It is always open to court to allow an amendment if it is of the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.