Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Shaik Reshma – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts leading to the petition. (Para 1) |
ORDER :
Juvvadi Sridevi, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings against her in S.C.No.34 of 2024 on the file of the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Mancherial, registered for the offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘ IPC ’).
2. Heard Sri Anuganti Praneeth, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State- respondent No.1. Even after service of notice, none appeared on behalf of unofficial respondent No.2. Perused the record.
3(a). The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows: One Smt.Pasupunuti @ Chatla Thirumaleshwari, W/o.Sampath (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), was working as a Junior Lecturer at TSWRS (Girls), Chennur. The accused Nos.1 to 5 are her colleagues working in the same institution. During the course of her employment, the deceased was entrusted with additional charge as Mess In-Charge. Owing to the said additional responsibility, the deceased was allegedly under mental stress and was suffer
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be a clear proximate link between the accused's actions and the suicide, which was not present in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
