SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1992

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Juvvadi Sridevi, J.
Shaik Reshma - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor and another - Respondents
Criminal Petition No.14269 of 2024
Decided On : 18-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anuganti Praneeth
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be a clear proximate link between the accused's actions and the suicide, which was not present in this case.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 306 - Abetment of suicide - Criminal proceedings against accused quashed for lack of evidence showing instigation or proximate link to the deceased's suicide. The court emphasized that mere allegations are insufficient to establish abetment. (Paras 4(a), 8, 12)

(B) Burden of Proof - The prosecution failed to demonstrate essential ingredients needed to constitute the alleged offence. Evidence of close proximity and connection to the deceased's actions was not sufficient. (Paras 10, 11)

(C) Investigation Lapse - Failure to examine key witnesses and gather incriminating material was a serious lapse, undermining the prosecution's case. (Paras 9, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of abetting the suicide of a colleague, who had been subject to work-related stress. The court found insufficient evidence to link her actions with the deceased’s suicide.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the absence of required elements of the alleged crime warranted quashing the proceedings.

Issues: The main issues addressed were whether the petitioner had any role leading to the deceased's suicide and the sufficiency of evidence for abetment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that there must be a clear connection between actions of the accused and the act of suicide for a conviction under Section 306 IPC. The absence of any cogent evidence led to the decision.

Result: Criminal proceedings against the petitioner-accused No.3 are quashed.

Table of Content
1. background facts leading to the petition. (Para 1)

ORDER :

Juvvadi Sridevi, J.

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings against her in S.C.No.34 of 2024 on the file of the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Mancherial, registered for the offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘ IPC ’).

2. Heard Sri Anuganti Praneeth, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State- respondent No.1. Even after service of notice, none appeared on behalf of unofficial respondent No.2. Perused the record.

3(a). The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows: One Smt.Pasupunuti @ Chatla Thirumaleshwari, W/o.Sampath (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), was working as a Junior Lecturer at TSWRS (Girls), Chennur. The accused Nos.1 to 5 are her colleagues working in the same institution. During the course of her employment, the deceased was entrusted with additional charge as Mess In-Charge. Owing to the said additional responsibility, the deceased was allegedly under mental stress and was suffering from depression. On 15.10.2023 at about 17:00 hours, the deceased telephoned her husband and informed him that her colleagues, namely the accused Nos.1 to 5, were subjecting her to mental harassment.

3(b). Upon receiving the said information, the husband of the deceased immediately went to the college, discussed the matter with the accused No.1, and thereafter took the deceased to their residence. On 16.10.2023 at about 06:00 hours, the husband of the deceased dropped her at the school. Thereafter, the deceased proceeded to Pedda Cheruvu, Chennur. Being unable to cope with the alleged work pressure and mental stress, she committed suicide by drowning in Pedda Cheruvu.

3(c). At about 08:00 hours on the same day, the husband of the deceased attempted to contact her over the phone; however, she did not respond. He then contacted the school staff to enquire about her whereabouts and was informed that she had not reported to duty. Subsequently, when he again dialed the deceased’s mobile phone, an unknown person answered the call and informed him that the deceased’s mobile phone and bag were found near Pedda Cheruvu, Chennur and at about 09:30 hours, the husband of the deceased rushed to Pedda Cheruvu, Chennur, where he found the dead body of the deceased. The dead body of the deceased was shifted to the Community Health Centre, Chennur, where the duty doctor examined the deceased and declared that she was brought dead. Thereafter, upon verifying the mobile phone of the deceased, the husband found certain voice recordings, wherein the deceased stated that the accused Nos.1 to 5 had mentally tortured and harassed her. On the basis of the said allegations, it is contended that the accused Nos.1 to 5 had committed offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of IPC .

4(a). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-accused No.3 has no involvement whatsoever in the alleged offences. It is contended that the petitioner- accused No.3 was appointed as Physical Education Teacher in the year 2023. In the 9th Zonal Level Sports Meet for the year 2023-24 from 13.10.2023 to 16.10.2023, the petitioner was included in the Transportation Committee and the deceased was included in the Food Committee. The petitioner and the deceased were in different committees and there was no occasion for them to work together and the petitioner had no role in the suicide committed by the deceased. In the absence of proximate live link between the petitioner-accused No.3 and the deceased, in connection with the death of the deceased. There is nothing to indicate that there was instigation or abetment by the petitioner- accused No.3 which had driven the deceased to take extreme step of committing suicide. The Police filed the charge sheet without proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top