SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 679

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Badri Prasad Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Eshaan Datt for petitioners; Vijay Kumar Shukla, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the rival parties, the matter was heard on 24.10.2024 at length and today the order is being pronounced.

2. This petition has been filed under section 482 of CrPC by the petitioners seeking the following relief:-

It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court be kind enough to allow this petition and quash and set aside the charge-sheet filed against the petitioners in Crime No.646/2022 by Police of Police Station-City Kotwali Satna, District-Satna (M.P.) under sections 306, 34, 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The encapsulated facts of the case are that the incident is said to have taken place between 6.10.2022 and 7.10.2022 and the FIR was lodged on 3.11.2022 alleging that the deceased was dwelling with her son in a rented premises of the petitioners. The petitioners’ son and the deceased became close which led to a relationship and later to a preganancy, that was terminated. Albeit, as per the allegations, the son of the petitioners started blackmailing the deceased on the anvil of her aberrant and obscene videos and photographs. It is alleged the incident was known by the petitioners but rather dissuading they persuaded their s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top