Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Employees State Insurance Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Osmania University, Hyderabad Rep. by its Registrar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 82 of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short ‘E.S.I. Act’) assailing the order passed in E.I.C.No.57 of 2008, dated 24.11.2015 by the Employees Insurance Court and Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-I at Hyderabad.
2. Appellants are the respondent Nos.1 to 3, respondent No.1 is the petitioner, respondent No.2 is the respondent No.4 in E.I.C. No.57 of 2008.
3.1. Respondent No.1-petitioner has filed petition under Section 75 (1) (g) of E.S.I. Act against the appellants -respondent Nos.1 to 3 and respondent No.2-respondent No.4 to declare that the action of the Corporation is illegal, unjust, contrary to law and also in violation of principles of natural justice by setting aside Section 45 -G Prohibitory Order bearing No.520.Q/0106-03, dated 28.02.2006 passed by respondent No.3 therein (appellant No.3 herein) and consequent order No.52-Q/0106-03, dated 13.10.2008 passed by respondent No.1 therein (appellant No.1 herein) by declaring them as illegal, unjust and contrary to law and consequently declare that the petitioner (respondent No.1 herein) is not liable to pay any contribution as demanded by t
An appeal against recovery proceedings under the E.S.I. Act is not maintainable without first challenging the correctness of the preceding order under Section 45-A.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when the order passed under Section 45-A of the ESI Act is not challenged and is allowed to become final, the consequential recovery proceedin....
Authority must not invoke Section 45A for best judgment assessment unless there is no submission of required documents; disputes should be resolved in ESI Court.
Damages under the E.S.I. Act are discretionary, not mandatory, and must consider genuine hardships, reaffirming that penalties should not automatically apply.
A determination order under Section 45A of the ESI Act is mandatory before issuing recovery notices for omitted wages, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for approaching the ESI Court for adjudication of disputes under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
Cooperation with authorities and production of genuine documents are essential in disputing establishment coverage under the E.S.I. Act.
A reading of Section 87 coupled with its proviso, makes it clear that an enquiry is to be done by the Government after hearing all the affected parties before passing orders in the exemption applicat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
