Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
G. Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
T.S. TRANSCO Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s background and seniority claims. (Para 1) |
| 2. interim suspension on seniority list. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondents argue seniority based on regulations. (Para 3) |
| 4. counterarguments regarding the transfer and seniority. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. petitioner's response to counterarguments. (Para 6) |
| 6. court’s analysis of applicable regulations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 7. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Petitioner was appointed as Trainee Assistant Engineer (Electrical) in APGENCO on 05-09-2000. APTRANSCO issued TOO Ms. No. 35 dated 13-05-2005 allowing absorption on transfer between companies and APGENCO adopted this by Memo dated 30-06-2005. When petitioner sought absorption in APNPDCL (now TSNPDCL); APGENCO requested APNPDCL’s concurrence via letter dated 09-12-2005, leading to G.O.O. No. 364 dated 19-12-2005 for mutual absorption of six AEs each. Petitioner was relieved via memo dated 05-01-2006 and joined APNPDCL on 01-02-2006, later promoted as Assistant Divisional Engineer, fully eligible for Divisional Engineer promotion.
1.1. Regulation 25(f) of APSEB Service Regulations Part-II states mutual transferees shall forego se
Employees transferred at their own request must forfeit previous seniority and accept the lowest rank in the new department, as stipulated by service regulations.
The court upheld the validity of the final seniority list, affirming compliance with the A.P. Reorganization Act and the One Man Committee's directives, while emphasizing the need for adherence to pr....
A court of law cannot be weaponized to seek benefit of a wrong.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the seniority of the petitioners should be counted from the date of their regularization as Assistant Engineers. The court also emphasized the....
Mutual transfers in Railway services must respect original seniority unless justified; improper reassignment mandates corrective action.
Prior service rendered before an inter-state transfer is valid for promotion eligibility, even if seniority is lost, as established by previous court rulings.
Seniority of transferred railway staff fixed below existing employees on own request or per mutual exchange rules, not initial appointment date.
Employment and Service matter - Assistant Engineers - Appointment of - Provisions of ‘Appointment by Transfer’ was restricted to count one third of service rendered by Junior Engineers prior to appoi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
