IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, ACJ., N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
Mohd. Afzal Khan and others – Petitioner
Versus
State of Telangana and others – Respondent
WP No.35106 of 2018
Decided On : 21-03-2025
ORDER :
N.V.Shravan Kumar, J.
This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 4 not to release the five sealed jewellery boxes deposited with respondent No.4 in safe deposit boxed being (i) 20/57-102 dated 05.07.1961; (ii) 21/24-160 dated 31.07.1962; (iii) 22/17- 172 dated 10.06.1963 and (iv) 45812 dated 08.04.1976 and (v) 70058 dated 24.04.1980 to any third party without deciding the rights and share of the petitioners in the above property or otherwise it would violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondent Nos.1 to 4 to decide the rights and shares of the petitioners in the jewellery which is in the custody of respondent No.4 before taking any decision to deliver the jewellery to any third party.
2. The petitioners herein claim to be legal heirs of defendant No.24 in C.S.No.7 of 1958 i.e., Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum w/o. Late Nawab Moin Ud Dowla Bahadur who is none other than the step mother of Late Nawab Zaheer Yar Jung Bahadur. It is stated that after the demise of Nawab Moid Ud Dowla, the erstwhile HEH Nizam was pleased to appoint late Nawab Zaheer Yar Jung (defendant No.1 in C.S.No.7 of 1958) as Amir E Paigah of all the properties including movables and immovables belonging to Asman Jahi Paigah and his son Nawab Moin Ud Dowla Bahdur. It is further submitted that upon the direction of Nawab Zaheer Yar Jung (Amir E Paigah), the family members including Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum deposited all their movable and immovable properties including jewellery and artifact in his custody and later was confiscated by the Department of Customs, Bombay and the same was taken into custody by respondent No.3 and deposited in the safe custody of respondent No.4 being boxes (i) 20/57-102 dated 05.07.1961; (ii) 21/24-160 dated 31.07.1962; (iii) 22/17-172 dated 10.06.1963 and (iv) 45812 dated 08.04.1976 and (v) 70058 dated 24.04.1980.
3. It is the further case of petitioners that Late Nawab Zaheer Yar Jung being the only custodian of the jewellery and the said movables and artifacts, and at no point of time assigned/transferred or conveyed the said jewellery in favour of third parties. It is submitted that C.S.No.7 of 1958 was filed by one Sultan Jahan Begum against Nawab Zaheer Yar Jung seeking partition and separate possession of the property belonging to Nawab Moin Ud Dowla Bahdur. During the pendency of the said suit, some of the defendants have entered into compromise with the plaintiff in pursuance of which preliminary decree was passed by this Court on 06.04.1959. As per the said decree, Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum i.e., defendant No.24 was entitled to her share in all the properties of Asman Jah including Jagir and other properties belonging to the Nawab Moin Ud Dowla.
4. As the matters stood thus, the Nizam E Atiyat was pleased to conduct enquiry and after enquiry, issued Muntakab No.3 in favour of Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum and other family members and that Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum passed away on 13.03.1970 issueless. In view of the same, all the legal heirs of Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum will be entitled for their respective shares as per Mohammaden Law. It is also submitted that Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum during her life time had gifted her share in all movable and immovable properties to her nephews (i) Mohd.Hussain Khan, (2) Mohd.Shamsheer Khan and (3) Mohd.Ghous Khan in the year 1965 and the receiver was paying jagir commutation amount from time to time to Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum and after her demise the said amounts were credited to the account of suit itself. Thereafter, the nephews of Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum filed O.S.No.1254 of 1972 on the file of III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the Jagir Administrator seeking declaration that they are the legal heirs of Late Smt.Raheem Unissa Begum and are entitled to get jagir commutation amount. The said suit was decreed holding that each of the said
The court affirmed that under Muslim inheritance law, consanguine relations (sister and brothers) have precedence over the claims of brothers' sons, validating the oral gift of properties executed by....
The court affirmed that prior final decrees in partition suits are binding and that claims based on wills must be established in separate proceedings.
The court affirmed that a succession certificate grants legal heirs entitlement to deceased's bank deposits, overriding nominee claims under the Banking Regulation Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's consideration of the contentious nature of the plaintiff's claim, the time lag in challenging the Gift Deeds, and the stressed circumst....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.