Back
LACHHMAN SINGH CHANDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MOTISINGH UMEDSINGH – Respondent
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff against a judgment and decree dismissing an appeal from the trial Court's decree which in turn dismissed the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff sought a declaration that he was entitled to exclusive possession of certain land, alternatively he claimed contribution. In this Court the appellant restricted the matter in dispute to fields Nos. 269 and 270 of mouza Atud. Bhikari. (In the lower Courts those fields the plaintiff had claimed exclusive possession of, alternatively he claimed contribution.) In the result he has been refused any relief. He has even been disallowed a share in those fields. That result has been arrived at on the following facts: The plaintiff and the defendants were co-owners of the village Atud. Bhikari. Defendant 1 was the lambardar. Fields Nos. 269 and 270 were in the possession of a tenant, who we will refer to as X. The plaintiff, though not the lambardar, purported to take a surrender of those fields from X and paid to X the consideration of Rs. 3000. An application was made by the lambardar under Section 13, Tenancy Act, which application ended with an order, dated 19th June 1933 putting the lambardar in posses
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
