SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Nagpur) 34

MACNAIR, SUBHEDAR
KANHAIYALAL MARWADI – Appellant
Versus
DAHLIA BARI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Macnair And Subhedar, A J C—On his own petition one Bapu was adjudged insolvent on 22nd September 1928 and the appellant, who is one of the creditors, was appointed a receiver to take charge of Bapu's estate. At the instance of the receiver warrants for attachment of the insolvent's property were issued and some property was attached. The respondent Dablia, a nephew of the insolvent, filed an objection against the attachment of one of the three attached houses and certain mango trees on the ground that the house belonged to him because of its having been allotted to his share at the private partition made between him and the insolvent about five years previously and that the trees were purchased by him from the insolvent on 10th August 1927. The insolvency Court held that there was no partition between the objector and the insolvent as alleged by the former, that both of them still formed a joint Hindu family and that therefore the attached property belonged to the joint family : the sale of the trees was held fraudulent. On these findings the insolvency Court passed the following order :

This is not a case where the objection has been filed by a son of the insolvent. Theref










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top