SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1928 Supreme(Nagpur) 109

PRIDEAUX
PUNAMCHAND AMARCHAND MARWARI – Appellant
Versus
EMPEROR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prideaux, A J C—In Civil Suit No. 266 of 1924 on the file of the Sub-Judge No. 2, Yeotmal, Udebhan son of Madhoji sued Mt. Tulja wife of Narayan, and Nenuram son of Jogidas Marwari, on a contract alleged to have been entered into with the plaintiff by defendant 1 for the sale of her two fields Survey Nos. 9 and 42 of mouza Kotamba. These fields were said to be inherited by the-woman on the death of her mother Mt. Mukti. She was to sell for Rs. 1,100 and was alleged to have executed a souda-chitti on 24th February 1924, having received Rs. 1,000, and agreeing to execute the sale deed within a month. She failed to do so. She was said to have executed a bogus sale-deed in defendant 2's favour on 12th April 1924, of the same fields. The plaintiff sued for specific performance of the contract of sale on payment of Rs. 100, the balance of the consideration.

2. For defendant 1 it was contended that on the death of her father Zingu, who owned the fields Survey Nos. 42 and 9, about 27 years ago his widows Deoki and Mukti enjoyed this land till their death. Deoki sold Survey No. 42 to Narayan and Tukaram 18 years ago and Mukti, i.e., defendant 1's mother, sold Survey No. 9 to Bhagoo B



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top